Zora Neale Hurston
by John B. Rosenman
I’m a teacher. Have been for a long
time. It’s not as important to me as my writing, but it’s pretty close, largely
because it involves writing. Now, I’m not talking about those student essays,
term papers, and tests which I have to mark up and grade. To tell the truth,
I’m sick and tired of them. After forty years, you get weary of wading through
garbled research papers without a thesis or sixty tests in which students all
answer the same questions in pretty much the same way.
No, besides teaching itself, which
can be downright fun and exhilarating, what makes my job most fulfilling are
the courses I’ve taught in creative writing. I’ve been fortunate enough to
teach them at two institutions of so-called higher learning. At Norfolk State
University in Virginia, where I teach now, I’ve had the opportunity to create
and teach my own course in writing Science Fiction and Fantasy, which can
stretch to include Horror and the Outright Bizarre. Needless to say, it can be
a blast to expose young minds to brave, strange, even demented new worlds, to
make them see that Shakespeare, Chaucer, and Faulkner aren’t the only ones who
have written classics.
Above all, I’ve had the opportunity
to awaken their imaginations and help them explore and develop their talent.
How good can they be? Is that pasty-faced kid in the corner a future Stephen
King, Poppy Z. Brite, or Ray Bradbury? You never know for sure.
Which brings me to my point: I’d
like to tell you about a student I once had. This was about thirty years ago at
a small black Southern college. I had expressed a desire to teach Creative
Writing, a course, which to my knowledge, had been in the curriculum for years
but never offered. It was an orphan sired by some idealistic or deranged
administrator, then forgotten. I was the first who volunteered to adopt it.
To my surprise, I was assigned the
course. And also to my surprise, students actually enrolled, all of them women.
As I recall, that made me even happier. The day I walked into my first creative
writing class and saw twelve young beautiful women looking back at me, I
thought, “By God, I may have chosen the right profession after all!”
Besides being giddy, I don’t
remember much about that first class. But I recall well what came after it. One
of my students brought a friend up to my desk, hoping to convince her to enroll
in the course. The friend differed from the others in being older, perhaps
fifty. When I urged her to take the course, she said, “Oh, I can’t do that, Dr.
Rosenman. I’m too stupid!”
Now it’s one thing to have low
self-esteem and to think you’re stupid, but to proclaim it to a stranger with
other people watching is . . . well, memorable. In all the years since then,
I’ve wondered, “Who told you that you were stupid, and what made you think that
way?” Later I learned that the woman (I’ll call her Carol) made $100 a month
as a cleaning woman. It was subsequently increased to $100 a week.
Whether Carol had other employment, I can’t say, but at the time it seemed her
lack of self-confidence was due largely to being black and poor in the South.
Anyway, Carol came into my class and
the first day she turned in a poem. I didn’t read it until the next day. And
then I reread and reread and reread it.
It was a sonnet on love, written in
iambic pentameter with an ABAB CDCD EFEF GG rhyme scheme. In it Carol used a
variety of poetic devices such as alliteration, assonance, similes and
metaphors.
While the poem itself was not
flawless, it was damned close. Perhaps two or three professional poets out of a
hundred could have equaled it. Needless to say, it didn’t seem to fit the
self-abasement she had displayed on our first meeting. If this was being
“stupid,” it was nothing to be ashamed about.
I wish I could tell you that Carol
is known today as Toni Morrison, Maya Angelou, or some other world-renowned
African-American writer, but that didn’t happen. Nor did she rise to the top of
the class on a wave of creative genius. Truth is, she was an average student
and received a “C” in Creative Writing. While that may not seem remarkable to
others, it still seems impressive as hell to me. After forty years of teaching,
Carol remains the most amazing student I’ve ever taught, the one who continues
to have the most profound impact on me. All the brilliant “A” students down
through the years fade in comparison despite their gifts.
I like to think we can learn certain
things from Carol’s example. First, when it comes to writing, talent may exist
in what seems the most unlikely or unpromising of places, so we should never
prejudge. A bum or homeless person might delight us, whereas a Nobel Prize
winner will leave us cold. Second, a superficial gift does not a writer make.
I’ve taught many students over the years who could construct a story with a
fair plot and good characterization, but a flash-in-the-pan glitter didn’t make
them writers. They might have skills or a knack, but not a calling, and
not the desire to practice and practice and practice their craft and develop as
writers. For all I know, Carol did become a poet or writer, and a damned
good one. But because (mea culpa!) I’ve long since forgotten her name, I
wouldn’t know. Then again, perhaps she’s like Emily Dickinson, who consigned
most of her superb work to her trunk, and it will remain to someone after her
death to discover her.
Last, I’ve tried to learn confidence
from Carol or at least develop a tendency not to judge my own writing talent
too harshly. And that ain’t easy, folks, since I tend to be negative,
self-critical, and full of doubts. Sometimes, when I write a story and I’m
slogging through the fourth or fifth revision, it seems to me it all
sucks, that everything from my style to my characters to my lack of logic
contributes to the worst piece of dreck in the western world. At such times I
shout, “I can’t do this. I’M TOO STUPID!”
But then I remind myself there
isn’t a simple litmus test for talent, that it’s more complicated than that.
Besides, I’m too close to the words and perhaps my story is better than I
think. Indeed, it might even be the equivalent of Carol’s brilliant poem. And
even if it isn’t, it’s ultimately the writing that counts, isn’t it? Not the
quality or critical acclaim. Not even all that potential money.
In the end, this is what Carol
taught me most: that we should write primarily because we want to and because
we must. We should write because the greatest miracles of all occur within our
own minds.*
* Previously published before I retired, but I thought it was worth a blog. :)
* Previously published before I retired, but I thought it was worth a blog. :)
I used to have a co-writer in a writer's group who had a learning disability. But what a writer! Her stories were absolutley delightful.
ReplyDeleteAnd "Carol" probably wrote to escape her mundane existence, to soar into worlds that would never be available to her otherwise. Fiction writing is an invigorating departure from our boring lives.
ReplyDeleteThis is a wonderful blog post, John. Thank you. I think we all have those moments when we think we are too stupid to do something or other. Sometimes those emotional times are those when we actually wind up shining.
ReplyDeleteThanks, Charlotte, I'm glad you like it. Kathy, I believe you're right. "Carol" wrote to escape and transcend the conditions of her life as well as to express herself. Suzanne, it's amazing how a disability can sometimes facilitate an ability. One door closes, and another opens.
ReplyDeleteThis comment has been removed by a blog administrator.
ReplyDeleteThank you, dear Jesse. I miss you. Much happiness to you in everything.
ReplyDeleteOh, my goodness, John, what a beautiful post! So glad you "recycled" it. Anyone who does something in the creative realm at one time or the other thinks, "What in the world do I think I'm doing? I'm no good at this." We can be our own worst critics. Maybe not just creatives think this way. When I wore my administrative hat, I remember times I left a meeting thinking, "Well, I blew that!" I'll share this for sure. (I gotta admit, I'm so self-conscious writing this post for someone who teaches creative writing! Talk about pressure to get it "right." LOL)
ReplyDeleteVery nice and very true. We can all be our own worst enemy's, I think the trick is to get over it and move on.
ReplyDeleteA fantastic story with such honest truism.
ReplyDeleteWhat a moving post --thanks for sharing.
ReplyDeleteOn a lighter note, I quote: "Now, I’m not talking about those student essays, term papers, and tests which I have to mark up and grade."
Had to laugh at this one. My mom teaches English/writing, and I grew up with a stack of papers perpetually on the kitchen table. Swore to myself I'd never teach. (Funny thing is, I was a special ed. teacher for awhile and loved it, but then again they didn't write papers, I just wrote reports!)
Be well,
Loren
Thank you for your comments. I'm glad you liked my post and that it moved some of you. Yes, we can be our own worst enemy, and we can be too critical of ourselves. Also, reading those darn papers can be the hardest part about teaching. Night after night, day after day. On another note . . . I'm not sure why a blog administrator removed Jessmyne Stephenson's comment. If he or she is reading this, I would appreciate an answer. Thank you.
ReplyDeleteWhat a great story and thoughts on human beings - not judging a book by its cover. I enjoyed your post. Thanks for sharing.
ReplyDeleteSunni